Emirates stewardess kiao-kar-ing

From ‘Caught in the act: Unglamorous behaviour of Emirates stewardess’, 6 April 2011,  article in Asiaone Relax.

AN EMIRATES flight attendant was recently spotted with her leg propped up on a luggage case at at an international airport.

…(A) traveller was at an international airport returning from Europe when he witnessed the Emirates staff raising her leg in a seemingly unpalatable manner.

According to the reader, it seems the uniformed stewardess, dressed in a pant-suit, was about to board the plane when she rested her foot on a trolley luggage in full view of other waiting passengers.

He said in an email to STOMP: “Imagine, air stewardesses should all be well-groomed and behave in a more ‘atas’ (high-class) manner.

“However, look at what I saw on my return trip from Europe.

“An Emirates air stewardess ‘kiao-kar-ing’ (putting her foot up) in front of all the passengers waiting to board the plane!”

 

Atas, my foot!

There’s something about stewardess’s feet that grabs travellers’ attention, whether it’s positioned at a halfway-to -kopitiam-uncle ‘kiao-kar’ ness, or what’s worn on them. Perhaps it’s unfair to rate the poise of other airlines’ flight attendants in comparison to our very own Singapore Girl, who having to squeeze herself into a skinny sarong kebaya without the luxury of a ‘pant-suit’ would kill for the chance to ‘shake some leg’ and let loose once in a while.  Unlike the weakly Singapore Girl, an Emirates attendant with a little ruffian in her would at least provide some assurance in the event of a hostage situation.  Striking a mildly threatening thuggish pose to signal casual authority is also nowhere as damaging to one’s company prestige as being caught taking a puff outside Changi Airport terminals as our Singapore Girls have, even when they have their tiny feet firmly and elegantly rooted to the ground while at it.

It’s a pain just to watch our SIA girls even kneel, and one can’t expect attendants, having to be on their feet most of the time on board, to swaddle around, backs straight, make-up on, lips moist, hips gently undulating even when they’re off duty like how those seductive SIA ads have led us to believe. Such complainants probably also expect stewardesses to also eat with their mouth closed, in small, lady-like bites, and finishing off their salad with a dainty dab with a napkin, tenderly folded into a perfect square before discarding. Woe betide the stewardess caught handling a chicken drumstick with her bare hands! Flight attending isn’t professional ballroom dancing, princess school or a nunnery,  so we shouldn’t belittle stewardesses for leaning their backs on a wall, hunching, stomping their feet when they walk, or raising their voices above the audible range of a sweet whisper. And even if she has flawless poise and all the makings of a master geisha, what spills out of her mouth while serving you will just put all the stifling etiquette and posture to total waste.

About these ads

Fatter Singapore Girls will be a problem for many

From ‘Stay lean, SIA girl’, 16 Oct 2010, Mailbag, Life! ST

(Tee Yee Chee): I don’t mean to be disrespectful or to discriminate but I honestly do not want to sit beside an overweight person during a long flight, especially when flying home.

Singapore Airlines did not become a leading airline just because the SIA girl looks slim, clean and pretty…It is easy to say you do not mind having a fatter Singapore Girl but it will be a problem for many.

This is like saying ‘I do not mean to be selfish, but I’m honestly taking the last parachute on the burning airplane.’ , or ‘I don’t mean to be racist, but I honestly prefer to sit next to people of my same race.’ What the hell does sitting beside an overweight passenger have anything to do with fat Singapore Girls? As far as I know, not having the privilege to fly with SQ notwithstanding,  flight attendants don’t sit next to passengers to chit chat idly and block people from shuffling out, and as for the inconvenience of accessing the aisles, she could be a beanpole or a behemoth and still take up the entire  passageway anyway as long as she’s pushing a trolley. And I don’t see why it’s so harrowing to sit next to fat people ‘especially when flying home’. Does having a fat person next to you mar your fond nostalgic mullings about home sweet home while tucking into a dinner that says ‘Traditional Fried Egg Noodles’ on the menu but tastes vaguely like Hokkien Mee?

First Yee Chee concedes that it takes more than the Singapore Girl image to sell the brand, but later turns around and says that fatter Singapore Girls will be a ‘problem for many’, without really explaining how or why. In the first place, if one already has preconceptions about the competency of fat people relative to their thinner peers, but wants to refrain from specifying out of political correctness,why even bother to bring it up?  Instead the writer confuses readers with his/her personal preferences of not being sandwiched by fat people in his seat, which really, has nothing to do with airline service, or how slim, clean and pretty the stewardesses are, and effectively shoots herself/himself in the foot, for instead of just targeting fat stewardesses, he/she ends up mocking fat people period. Contradicting arguments aside, the Saturday Mailbag column seems to have a freewheeling tolerance towards xenophobic, racist, discriminatory contributors, as seen in this rant against black French footballers.

 

 

SIA girls romping through the fields

From ‘Change SIA girls’ image for their sake’ 12 June 1991 ST Forum

…’Singapore Girl’ advertisments project an atmosphere of romantic sexuality, of women who are out to please and to serve. The soft focus pictures of Singapore Girls in London cabs, romping through the fields, sitting alone at dinner tables, blowing provocatively at American Express cards or just smiling and looking ever so available, only serve to create the impression that they provide more than the usual service.

The music and the lyrics which accompany the pictures enhance the image of the woman as a sex object. The Airlines’ catch-phrase, “Singapore Girl…you are a great way to fly’ has a sexual connotation to it.

…Only when SIA stops using women to sell its service will men be inhibited from taking liberties with its stewardesses

From Zaibun Sirah, founder member of AWARE

One of the first AWARE salvos fired which fell on deaf ears, as nothing has changed since 1991. The sarong kebaya is still as tight fitting, the ladies are still comely, though the mystique and glamour of the Singapore Girl as an icon has vanished from TV. Most airline ads of the era focused on service, which when lacklustre, was at least compensated for by the suggestion of Singapore Girls being after-hours high society escorts.  These days, most people will just go budget airways, where the attire is less restrictive and more conducive to actual inflight service. Besides, real stewardesses wouldn’t mingle with foreigners in uniform, no less than write airmail alone in a room in one. I still don’t get why calling ‘someone a great way to fly’ is in any way lewd, perhaps Ms Zaibun needs some lessons in innuendo before branding an immortal tagline as an instruction for copulation .




Sarong panty girls

From ‘年轻女郎越穿越大胆 穿透明沙龙上夜店’ 8 June 2010, article in omy.sg

…现在的年轻女子到夜店消遣时所穿的衣着越来越“无拘无束”…在热门的夜店看到一些妙龄女郎,只用一条扎头发的丝巾来当“裙 子”穿,然后再穿一件几乎是透明的连体泳衣。

她们在暴露部分胴体的同时,身体的其他部位就像被类似急救时用的包扎绷带“扎”得紧紧的。

…不少迪斯科已经变成女郎们炫耀双峰及展示乳头的场所。

一些受访的男公众也认为,这些敢敢穿的惹火尤物在穿着方面,比一些出卖肉体的夜生活女郎还要大胆,加上撩人的姿态,往往看得他们心跳加速。

Translation: A Wanbao reader has been observing that girls at nightspots are wearing lesser and lesser these days, with one found to be wearing a headscarf or sarong for a dress, and a transparent swimsuit on top of it. Many female clubbers  have the tendency of exposing their breasts in full view . Some interviewed men even think they dress bolder than prostitutes.

Of course it’s rather strange that it would be men of all people to complain about sexy dressing or lack of for the matter. For most men, the only instance of complaining about a bare back or exposed nipples on another woman would be to their girlfriends or spouses, in mock  revulsion when it’s actually a convenient excuse to gawk secretly. It’s kinda like tucking into a bucket of KFC while bemoaning the unethical practices of chicken coop production. They’re really just short of blaming provocative attire for turning them into rapists, an argument of course, as old as the first exposed neckline on Vanity Fair.

Sarongs, in the form of the non-transparent and thigh-covering kebaya, have irked some for their lack of functionality, especially when worn by SIA stewardesses, as can be seen from this ST letter ‘Sarong Kebaya and Air Safety’ 10 Aug 1968. 1968! The SIA uniform is freakin more than 40 years old!

Unfounded concerns nonetheless, considering that the ‘restrictive dress’ is not what modern passengers are worried about these days, rather SIA stewardesses’ command of the English language. The intention of the ‘flowing encumbrances’, naturally, is to give our Singapore Girls a geisha-like tiny-feet-shuffle while serving you your coffee or tea, and looking at our airline safety track record, one can say the hypothesis of hampering of life-saving manoeuvres by the uniform remains to be tested till this day. Shorten it for functionality though, and you’ll have an infinite regress of people complaining that it’s ‘too short’ or ‘too sexy’. Which indeed has happened, but that’s for another blog post altogether.

S.I.A-OK

From “OK’s not okay”, 29 march 2010, My Point ST Forum online

On a recent flight, when I asked if I there were any empty seats available, an SIA stewardess replied, ‘OK’. I was puzzled.

On my return trip, the captain welcomed us to ‘SQ fRight…’. As a Singaporean on board an SIA flight, I felt embarrassed about the improper pronunciation and inability of the crew to communicate the basics.

A great way to FRY indeed.  Admit it, we all fall prey to mispronunciation sometimes. Can’t possibly be as bad as it was in 1984.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 170 other followers