Daniel Ong calling neighbour Sivalin-ganam style

From ‘He made fun of my name’, 26 Oct 2012, article by Foo Jie Ying, TNP

A dispute between neighbours over renovation noise led to one of them making a police report against the other, claiming that the latter had made fun of his name. In the report made on Oct 16, he said: “By making fun and changing my family surname, he is insulting and degrading the Indian culture.”

In an interview with The New Paper On Tuesday evening, Mr Sivalingam Narayanasamy, 55, said: “What he has done is to change my surname.” The other party in the dispute is former radio deejay Daniel Ong, 36, who is now known as a celebrity cupcake-shop owner with his wife, Miss Singapore-Universe 2001 Jaime Teo.

Mr Sivalingam showed TNP a letter purportedly written by Mr Ong to him, in which Mr Ong allegedly made fun of his name. In the letter, Mr Ong referred to Mr Sivalingam as “Sivalin-ganamstyle” and added, “That’s my new nickname for you… cool, huh?”

Mr Ong addressed this on his Facebook page, saying: “He claims I insulted him coz I addressed him as Sivalingam num-style in my last letter… but I told him that I didn’t mean that and it’s the coolest thing around now.”

If you read the contents of Daniel Ong’s letter for yourself, you’ll find it full of sarcastic insults, spite, fake LOLS and general meanness. From the way how this neighbourly spat has been overblown, it’s obvious that Sivalingam’s racist accusation is a pretext for filing against Ong’s nastiness and intolerance over a baby-tormenting and ‘old-lady murdering’ renovation project. As with his grudge against SPH, the ex-DJ has made his Facebook page his personal diary and broadcaster now that he’s gone from radio. Regardless of who’s at fault here,  this is really an exaggerated episode of neighbours thrashing it out over one ugly incident after another, culminating in a sensational turf war with a typical but ultimately futile standoff involving the police. I wonder what will become of these two once it’s Christmas.

It’s like two boys fighting in the playground and one threatening with his daddy because the other called him names and he had no comeback. The natural tendency in such testosterone-charged scuffles is for the one picked on to retort with a creative insult of his own, until both get tired of this one-upping nonsense and walk away. At least these two grown ups are civil enough not to bring their Mamas into it or roll around in the mud throwing punches. Conflicts of this sort are inevitable, no matter how we try to inculcate a ‘give and take’ culture, when in fact we’re mostly looking after our own interests and ‘community’ means running into that comfort zone and pacifier called Facebook where your ‘friends’ are obliged to support you all the way even if you’re acting like a child who just got his rattle nicked by a bully.

When it comes to a war of words, it’s unlikely that Sivalingam would get the upper hand over a cupcake king with the gift of the gab (Daniel even refers to himself as ‘FUNNY GUY” on his Twitter page), hence to counter his weakness in petty insult-trading, the big guns have to be summoned on a hot-potato issue (racism) just to show that he means business. I’m not even sure if this guy knows what Gangnam Style is, which may explain why he would consider the name-mashing a childish insult, maybe the equivalent of the Chinese ‘Tan Ah Kow’.  He does cut an imposing figure however, like a superintendent in the force, or someone who runs a butchery franchise and boxes hunks of meat in his spare time.  Daniel Ong (who once played ‘Mr Kiasee’ in the Mr Kiasu sitcom) will get his cupcakes SQUASHED if put in a ring with this bull of a man.

Don’t call him Gangnam

What’s worrying, and yet strangely assuring at the same time, is why our police EVEN BOTHER with such things (Assuring because it means our cops have nothing much to do). Well I suppose if they’re forced to investigate teachers who cut the hair of students without permission, this fight between an angry celebrity and his angry neighbour must seem as exciting as taking down rival triads in comparison. Gangs of Mei Hwan Drive perhaps. Still, this is what happens if you have public endorsement of the over-the-top censuring of anything mocking a minority race. You give people excuses to point fingers at the one thing that will get your enemies in trouble, when you’re really pissed off with them because they embarrassed you, not because they humiliated your race, your family, your ancestry and your gods.

Siva claims discrimination when Daniel Ong mashes up his surname with Gangnam style, while the latter explains the pun away as a reference to his ‘threatening’ stance with arms akimbo. Neither argument makes sense. I can’t imagine an aggressor doing this in a mano-a-mano confrontation, unless he’s trying to subdue you with laughter.

Please don’t hurt me. I’ll do anything

I suspect it’s harmless wordplay more than anything else, though these days dropping sly racial references is like tossing firecrackers on a minefield. Siva doesn’t have a case because Gangnam itself has already taken Indians by storm, and just about anyone with an Internet connection and doesn’t understand a single word of Korean.

About these ads

Daniel Ong charged $3K for posting SPH articles

From ‘Storm in a cupcake’, 6 July 2012, article by June Yang, Today online

…In a series of Twitter and Facebook posts, Mr Daniel Ong – a former DJ for radio stations in both MediaCorp and SPH’s stables – said he was asked to pay a sum of S$535 for each of the articles featuring his business Twelve Cupcakes or his wife and co-owner Jamie Ong that he had put up on the Twelve Cupcakes website and shared via social media.

He also said he had been charged an additional S$214 for “investigative fees”. According to Mr Ong’s Facebook post, SPH continued to ask payment for the investigative fees even after he agreed to remove the articles from his website.

Mr Ong wrote on his Facebook post: “Did you know? Business owners are not allowed to share stories about themselves on their websites unless they pay … Stalls and cafes can’t photocopy (articles) and put them at their stalls or signboards unless they pay. I never knew that!”

Sweets for his sweet

In May this year, TNP gave a glowing review of 12 cupcakes (3.5/5), in which the the couple revealed the origins of the name (12 holes in a baking tray) and why they decided to go into the confectionery business. Herworld described their creations with the suggestive ‘oh-so-moist’ and the queasy ‘handmade with love’, which got me thinking of Demi Moore and Patrick Swayze in Ghost for some reason. Of course you hardly see a scathing critique of celebrity FnB ventures, though I wonder if ‘star power’, TV appearances, curiosity and word of mouth alone would have been sufficient to drive this sideshow sweet-shop to become the smashing success that it is today. If a well-known celebrity host could get away with naming his food establishment after ‘Porn’, I don’t see anyone else in the media circle getting less than a 3-star review, whether it’s selling cupcakes or char siew rice. National bowler Remy Ong once had a stint selling POPIAH. Long term success, however, is another matter altogether. Think Planet Hollywood.

According to the ST website, the prohibition of unauthorised commercial use of their content is implicitly stated under ‘News Post Enquiry Form’.

To republish any Singapore Press Holdings articles and photographs, please contact us via the request form by providing the following details so that we can revert to you with the necessary copyright fees and license before any republication can be made

Nowhere in the site do you see a ‘Terms and Conditions’ or ‘WARNING’ link, but what bothers me here is not so much why ANYONE would pay SPH hundreds of dollars just to reproduce their material, but the phrase ‘we can REVERT to you’, which is more embarrassing than hounding enterprising celebrities for copyright infringement charges like glorified loan sharks. In the age of copy, rip, burn and ‘RT’s, SPH’s anal-clenching grip on ‘ownership’ seems out of touch with the alternate digital universe in which we’re spending more of our lives, where posting and sharing content has become as natural as breathing. It’s like a a park warden confiscating the canvas from a painter for making an ‘unauthorised copy’ of the sunrise in his premises. Should bloggers who earn advertising revenue from quoting or retweeting ST articles fall under ‘commerical use’ as well? In a 7 July 2012 ST response to this cupcake controversy, other than deferring to the power of copyright law:

SPH confirmed that hawker stalls and cafes can frame up an actual print article for display, but copying it would constitute an infringement of copyright.

Which begs the question of the definition of ‘copying’. It’s understood from the above statement that you can only cut out and laminate ST articles from actual newpapers. You cannot make a photocopy of ST from the library, but can you take a photo of the page then? How about only ‘quoting’ excerpts from the papers? How many words are you allowed to ‘quote’ before it constitutes a violation of identity theft?

Late last year, SPH sued Yahoo news site for ‘free-riding’ on the efforts of their editorial staff.  In 2001, Today published apology for  using an ST image of a SilkAir pilot (You’re supposed to buy images from their ‘Photobank’). I’m also wondering what amounted to ‘investigative fees’ here; I did the same ‘detective work’ in less than a minute digging up where Daniel Ong posted the SPH links (on his website, duh.) Perhaps instead of paying them the $200 fee, Daniel and Jaime should instead dedicate a limited edition cupcake flavour (in addition to their signature Red Velvet and Chocolate Chocolate) worth that amount in honour of SPH’s dogged diligence in weeding out copycats. They could call it, I dunno, Copyright Crankyberry or something, and become the Ben and Jerry of Cupcakes.

The recipe for a $200 novelty cupcake could be something like this:

  • 1 cup of sugar, 2 cups flour, 2 eggs, 500g salty butter, and whatever stuff that makes cupcakes cupcakes.
  • 3/4 cup of cranberries, 2 tbp artificial vanilla essence, grated blue cheese, prune bits, nata de coco, and a cherry soaked in brandy for 535 days.
  • A generous sprinkling of gold flakes, a stuffing made up of caramelised $50 bills, and a miniature candy Volkswagen on top.

Richmonds telling Grandfather stories on radio

From ‘Trend of multiple radio DJs sacrifices that old personal touch’ 24 April 2012 and ‘More on what’s wrong with morning radio’ 25 April 2012, ST Forum.

(Victor Khoo): WHY does a person listen to the radio? Apart from getting information, news and music, a radio listener wants someone to keep him company; a proxy for personal, warm and friendly one-to-one companionship.

For the radio listener, that companion is the deejay on air. So the test of a good radio deejay is to be able to communicate with his listeners in a manner that replicates a personal, face-to-face encounter via the restricted confines of audio contact. This is not easy.

…Unfortunately, the new trend among local radio stations is to have two or more deejays hosting one show for reasons fathomable only to these broadcasting stations. I say unfortunately because this trend robs the station of that personal touch.

More often than not, the listener ends up literally as a passive eavesdropper on a bunch of men and women talking and joking among themselves in a cacophony of chatter.

(Chow Hon Meng):…I have concerns as well about radio stations, particularly the morning show on Gold 90FM, hosted by Brian Richmond and his son Mark, who have been joined by MediaCorp actor Gurmit Singh.

Why must the peak-hour morning time slot have an advisory warning that parental guidance is needed for listeners? Isn’t it obvious that a morning show covers the period when families are having breakfast together before leaving for school and work?

I am no prude, but should we ‘licence’ radio deejays who wish to swop raunchy jokes at 9am? Surely, there are more appropriate time slots for a round-the-clock medium like radio?

Gold 90FM’s tripartite father-son-actor deejay format makes listeners like me feel like eavesdroppers because of the family-show slant. The Richmonds try to regale listeners with grandfather stories, literally at times; there are also occasions when a grandson or son calls in or one of the three is busy reading a personal SMS from his wife.

Three's a crowd

I’ve ever only heard the Richmonds hosting a show together a few times and though not exactly a hoot, it was amusing to have the younger Richmond tease the elder veteran with the latter lacking any sort of comeback whatsoever. Brian’s velvety baritone doesn’t seem appropriate for the sort of wacky humour you would want to wake up to or end the day with. It’s like laughing at Barry White or the Pope and I suspect the old man would be overwhelmed by Phua Chu Kang joining in the fray. Perhaps this a desperate plea for ratings, and it’s a shame that the homely, orange-juice and cereal vibe of the Richmonds show has to resort to cheap morning antics by adding an obvious comedian in. It’s like lathering waffles with condensed milk. Over the top.

Trios in  shows mean more banter, less music, as each presenter tends to wrestle for attention, and to me, three’s a definite crowd. But somehow it’s the duos that crank up the sleaze, especially around the time when the kids are packing their school bags.  You also don’t hear of all female DJ teams because you always need a male to bear the brunt of jokes or dispense toilet humour. Morning shows are notorious for bawdiness and DJs getting fined or sacked  for it, whether it’s  asking boys about white panties, getting people to moan like they’re having sex on air, mocking Indian accents or getting beauty contestants to strip off their bras without exposing themselves. Even the titles of such shows are dead giveaways for the kind of ‘no holds barred’ content that attract listeners: Morning Glory, Five Guys and a Girl, Rude Awakening etc, which all sound like titles of 90′s porn VCDs. But put a couple of men or opposite sexes together long enough and eventually you’ll have to stumble on a sexual topic somehow or other. Or at least a fart joke, or politically incorrect discussions on male-female stereotypes. Otherwise it’s traffic on the PIE and headlines of the day. You might as well tune in to a recording of yesterday’s Toto result announcements.

There could be a few explanations as to why Mediacorp is dropping the ‘personal touch’. Jokes and anecdotes are always funnier shared, and a DJ unleashing those while alone in the studio, without the satisfaction of a human response, is like a stand up comedian trying to tickle a wall. It also helps that laughter is contagious, and we’re more likely to laugh along if another DJ laughs at his partner’s joke than if the latter cracks one alone, or if he/she does at all. When someone else laughs, we acknowledge that a joke has been made. When someone laughs at his own joke, we wonder what’s so funny. We’re no longer the lonely souls who want Brian Richmond or William Xavier to coddle us with their rich, chocolately voices and tuck us into bed anymore. We don’t  need the ‘company’ (the Internet provides too much of that already), we just want to be entertained. Sometimes it’s not so much the content of the banter, but the power plays lurking within that’s captivating, like how one DJ tends to dominate another, or trying to tease apart the rapport from the filler. In a way it is indeed like eavesdropping on a couple of roommates bitching, and trying to guess who wears the pants in the relationship. But what’s wrong with that?

Today’s listeners crave for gossip, weird news and quirky facts, not just because they’re light-hearted and entertaining, but because they feed our cries for attention whenever we relay such information to our friends, family and co-workers. Radio gossip and jokes empower us socially by enhancing our watercooler small-talk skills. It weathers those awkward silences during those long drives in your boss’s car. Not that a solo DJ can’t deliver these with aplomb (it takes great talent and charisma), but humans are more attuned to heated conversations than a lone ranger telling us which important person’s birthday it is today or asking us whether we’ve had breakfast or not, even if he or she has the perkiest, rosiest, maple-syrupy, dewiest, morning sunshine voice in the history of radio.

F word on Last Man Standing

From ‘F**k word seen on Channel 5′, 29 Aug 2011, article in insing.com translated from SM Daily

Former radio DJ Danny Yeo posted on his blog yesterday that he had spotted the F word appearing in a Channel 5 programme. The gaffe is understood to have come from the programme “Last Man Standing” which airs at 11pm on Sundays.

Danny uploaded a screenshot of the programme on his blog and commented that TV seems to have trumped newspapers in media freedom.

The former DJ remarked that even newspapers had universally refrained from printing the F word during the recent uproar over Trinetta Chong, the valedictorian at an Nanyang Technological University (NTU) convocation ceremony who uttered a profanity at the end of her speech.

Member of Parliament Teo Ser Luck also added his take on the issue. He said that vulgarities should not be appearing on TV, and that the broadcaster should consider the thoughts and feelings of different segments of society. He emphasises that this may convey improper messages to the young.

Channel 5 has apologised for the gaffe and attributed it to a technical error. The Media Development Authority (MDA) is investigating the incident.

That sounds serious

Last Man Standing is about pitting the puny urban male physique against the battle-worn chassis of the tribal warrior in a bid to prove whether modern life has made us wimpy. Which explains why contestants may overcompensate by spouting language taken in the city context to be an indication of raw masculinity, or rather bearing a bark worse than his bite.  Even veteran users would be stumped by this substitution of ‘fuck’ for verbs which are sufficiently harsh and descriptive to begin with: hurt, hit, injured, scraped, sprained, twisted etc. If he had bumped his head would he say ‘I ‘fucked’ my head’? What if he got knocked on the buttocks? The use of the F word here doesn’t amplify the emotional impact of the injury, and the non-carnal use of ‘fuck’ as a verb is often restricted to sweeping ambiguity rather than to replace a specific force, such as ‘fuck it’ (the hell with it) or ‘This project is fucked’ (doomed). The more appropriate expression, without making one’s statement sound like a depraved auto-erotic act, would be ‘I got thrown yesterday and hurt my ‘fucking’ knee’. But that’s besides the point. This snippet should have been bleeped from the source, and we wouldn’t know if gritty profanity was the producers’ intention, or Mediacorp simply inherited a production error.

So much work has gone into the details of defining restrictions for PG-13 movies that the Board of Censors somehow let this TV gaffe slip by. But the irony is that children are spending more time online over TV, where they are more likely to pick up more creative permutations of the f word, be it through forums, video streaming or by downloading music, which makes regulating TV and programme subtitles somewhat like plugging a sinking boat with cotton balls. We persist in it because we still see our broadcasters to be responsible role models, being both educators and entertainers, while this invisible moderator is absent in the new media. We have somehow personalised the TV as a nanny surrogate, which makes us less tolerant to profanity if TV is supposed to be keeping the kids occupied while we work. But that’s not saying that television shouldn’t be censored. It should and will be for as long as TV exists, but only because we can, and it gives the Board of Censors people a job to do.  Trinetta Chong’s ‘fucking did it’ speech has nothing to do with this mistake, and newspapers haven’t ‘refrained’ from printing the F word according to Danny Yeo. They were NEVER SUPPOSED TO at all.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 184 other followers